Poor commentary with no documentation or citation. At least point to the source of data for 200 plus countries. Presumably from IHME at the University of Washington.
This paper is worth reading. The caricature is not.
Global, regional, and national trends in the morbidity gap and contributing diseases, injuries, and risk factors, 1990–2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023,” The Lancet Public Health, 2026, DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(26)00098-8
Also lovely new longitudinal data on centenarian heath across lifespan for a very large Swedish population that demonstrates persistent morbidity advantages compared to very well matched non-centenarians. Fun papers too:
DOI:
10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103396
DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaf050
DOU: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003784
And these conditions account are major contributors to the change:
depression, anxiety, hearing loss, and low back pain. All are highly subject to diagnostic drift.
>This paper is worth reading. The caricature is not.
AI, is that you?
Carricature of what?
It's a commentary post. Doesn't need to cite everything, the numbers can easily be googled, and are not some cryptic, disputable, numbers to begin with, but widely available.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UiVKh97rJsg
reply